• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Charter Pacific

Charter Pacific

An Investment Company

  • Home
  • News
  • Our Technologies
  • About
  • Investor Centre

Apple Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd’s complaint that it infringes three of CPC’s patents is DENIED

12 January 2022 By Charter Pacific

 

On 12 January 2022 United States District Judge Alan D Albright denies Apple Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd’s complaint that it infringes three of CPC’s patents.

 

Below is an extract of the Memorandum Opinion and Order from Judge Albright.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

 

CPC PATENT TECHNOLOGIES PTY LTD.,

          Plaintiff,                                                                           CASE NO. 6:21-CV-00165-ADA

v.

APPLE INC.,                                                                               JULY TRIAL DEMANDED

          Defendant.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The Court considers Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff CPC Patent Technologies PTY LTD.’s complaint. ECF No. 23. Plaintiff filed its opposition, and Defendant filed its reply. ECF Nos. 25, 26.

Plaintiff complained that Defendant directly and indirectly infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 9,269,208 (“’208 Patent”), 9,665,705 (“’705 Patent”), and 8,620,039 (“’039 Patent”). ECF No. 1 at 27-28, 33-34, 39-40. Plaintiff accuses Defendant’s iPhones and iPads with Apple Card loaded into the iPhone Wallet of infringing the ’039 Patent and accuses iPhones and iPads with TouchID or FaceID of infringing the ’208 Patent and ’705 Patent. Id.  2. Plaintiff seeks past damages. Id. at 7.  The complaint attaches supporting documents and infringement claim charts. ECF No. 1, Exs. A-J.

After careful consideration of the briefs and applicable law, the Court GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART Plaintiff’s Motion.


CONCLUSION

Defendant’s motion to dismiss direct and indirect infringement of the ’039 Patent is GRANTED-IN-PART. Plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint within one week of this Order that clearly articulates its infringement theory.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss direct and indirect infringement claims of the ’208 and ’705 Patents is DENIED. Defendant has leave to renew its motion if Defendant prevails on the disputed construction at the Markman hearing and Plaintiff fails to amend its infringement contentions consistent with the prevailing construction.  

Defendant’s motion to dismiss claims to past damages is DENIED.

 

Click here to view the full decision handed down – https://www.charpac.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Memorandum-Opinion-and-Order.pdf

Category iconNews

Footer

Contact


Email

charpac@charpac.com.au


Phone

+61 7 5538 2558


Address:

Level 1, 18 Tedder Avenue
Main Beach, Queensland 4217


Quick Links

  • Home
  • News
  • Our Technologies
  • About
  • Investor Centre

Copyright © 2026. Charter Pacific Corporation Limited. All rights reserved. Return to top