Extract of the decision handed down by Justice Ball in regard to Charter Pacific Corporation Limited v Securicom (NSW) Pty Limited (No 4)
“It is plain from what I have said that Mr Burke made representations to the effect that Microlatch HK had rights in respect of the Patents, when plainly Microlatch HK and Mr Burke had none. Those representations were made by Mr Burke on behalf of Microlatch HK. Accordingly, both Mr Burke and Microlatch HK engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct in contravention of s 18 of the ACL.”
Click here to view the full decision handed down – [2021] NSWSC 1618